- As below, Haley Barbour’s dreamy nostalgia for pre-civil rights Mississippi is not “false nostalgia,” but it is a rather insidious false memory–the kind of misunderstanding of history that should probably bar one from becoming a serious presidential candidate, but probably won’t. (An editorial in the Times calls it “the faulty memory all too common among those who stood on the sidelines during one of the greatest social upheavals in history.”) It is kind of amazing to watch as Barbour realizes that he shouldn’t admit to “remembering” things this way, and recasting the era as “difficult and painful” where he’d just claimed, “I just don’t remember it as being that bad.”
“Memory has long been the mutable clay of the South, changing the meaning of the Civil War and now the civil-rights era,” the editorial concludes. “But the memory of Mr. Barbour’s personal history will not soon fade.” Or will it?
- I’m not much of a Weezer fan, but the fixation on their early output versus the band’s historic disdain for it–and their recent realization that it’s better if they just embrace it–is kind of interesting. Vulture and the Times report from the band’s current Memories Tour. Of the “alt-rock time machine, Jon Pareles writes, “For the grown-up Weezer, the boldness and fragility, the instability and impulsiveness of ‘Pinkerton’ are now memories. Getting ‘back there’ would be a feat.” Amos Barshad’s piece is headlined “Weezer Is Excellent at Pretending Like It’s 1994.”
- Predictable, yes, but I will probably be seeing this:








